The following excerpt is from United States v. Barnawell, 341 F. Supp. 619 (S.D. Cal. 1972):
The defendant argues that this second interrogation amounts to a classic violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1965), which explicitly stated that no questioning can be permitted after the defendant indicates in any manner that he wishes to remain silent or that he desires an attorney.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.