The following excerpt is from Heyne v. Caruso, 69 F.3d 1475 (9th Cir. 1995):
Likewise, in Greatreaks v. United States, 211 F.2d 674, 676 (9th Cir.1954), we excused the defendant's failure to make a further offer of proof on a quarrel between the defendant and a police officer because the trial court had announced in advance that it would not receive evidence concerning that quarrel. The defendant sought to introduce the quarrel to discredit the officer's testimony alleging that the defendant had bribed the officer. We added that after such an exclusionary ruling, "the persistence of counsel in making or repeating such offers may be treated as improper attempts to get before the jury the
Page 1482
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.