Is there any case law supporting the argument that a person convicted of a different crime is entitled to the same status?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Descano, 199 Cal.Rptr.3d 297, 245 Cal.App.4th 175 (Cal. App. 2016):

"Persons convicted of different crimes are not similarly situated for equal protection purposes. [Citations.]" (People v. Macias (1982) 137 Cal.App.3d 465, 473, 187 Cal.Rptr. 100 ). " [I]t is one thing to hold ... that persons convicted of the same crime cannot be treated differently. It is quite another to hold that persons convicted of different crimes must be treated equally. [Citation.]" (People v. Jacobs (1984) 157 Cal.App.3d 797, 803, 204 Cal.Rptr. 234.)

We find that defendant has failed to demonstrate that two similarly situated groups have been treated in an unequal

[199 Cal.Rptr.3d 301]

Other Questions


Is a person who aids or abets a crime liable for the crime if the original crime was committed independently by another person? (California, United States of America)
What is the basis for the argument that a person who believes in a different type of marriage is entitled to a different marriage? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between the mental state required for a conviction of a specific intent crime and that of those convicted of a general intent crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who is convicted of receiving stolen property in one crime, but never charged or convicted of the other crime, be required to pay restitution for losses sustained in other crimes? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that identification of a crime scene prior to the crime scene is more accurate than later? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant is convicted of multiple crimes arising out of the same act or an indivisible course of conduct, can they be convicted of more than one of the crimes? (California, United States of America)
Can a convicted felon who has completed his sentence for a conviction for a crime committed under Proposition 47, who would have been guilty of a misdemeanor under the same legislation, apply to have the conviction reduced to a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Court reverse the conviction of defendant in the second-degree murder trial of a man convicted of the crime of murder for making false statements about the crime scene? (California, United States of America)
What is a reasonable inference for a judge to conclude that a person who has not been convicted of a crime has committed a crime by way of reasoning? (California, United States of America)
Are there any cases that support the argument that a person who is not a plaintiff in a civil case is entitled to be considered a witness? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.