The following excerpt is from Tamale v. Regents of University of California, 908 F.2d 977 (9th Cir. 1990):
Tamale contends that the district court erred by failing to allow him to introduce certain documents. It appears, however, that the documents were admitted and considered by the court. At any rate, even assuming that some of the documents were excluded, Tamale failed to show how his case was prejudiced by the alleged omissions. See Jauregui v. City of Glendale, 852 F.2d 1128, 1131 (9th Cir.1988) (trial court's exclusion of evidence will not be reversed absent some showing of prejudice).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.