Is there any case law in which a jury should have excluded evidence of a defendant's admissions to police?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Cardenas, C069229 (Cal. App. 2018):
(2) That the trial court should have excluded evidence of his admissions to police, on the grounds his statements were involuntary and police violated Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 (Miranda).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a defendant's failure to make a specific objection to or to exclude or strike evidence on the basis of erroneous admission of evidence cognizable? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have authority to exclude evidence where a defendant has been found to be contrary to the evidence code under section 352 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law in which a defendant has argued that defense counsel should have sought to exclude or restrict the impeachment evidence discussed in Section II of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances have the courts permitted the admission of statements from a defendant to police as evidence for impeachment purposes? (California, United States of America)
Can testimony of an ordinary witness who claims to have heard the confession or damaging admission of a criminal defendant be excluded from evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is evidence of extrajudicial admissions to the police admissible? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for summary adjudication on a motion to exclude evidence as to drainage, does plaintiff need to explain to the arbitrator why it was necessary to exclude the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant exclude evidence that is prejudicial to the codefendant under section 352 of the Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances have the courts permitted the admission of statements from a defendant to police as evidence for impeachment purposes? (California, United States of America)
What evidence supports the inference that a defendant or his companion knew the vehicle contained police officers until the vehicle was identified as a police vehicle? (California, United States of America)
