Is there an abuse of discretion in a trial court's evidentiary ruling?

Can a judge be found to have abused his discretion by failing to rule on the basis of a reporter's transcript or other record of the reasons for the trial court's ruling? (California, United States of America)

Does a motion for a new trial need to be denied because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)

What are the evidentiary rulings of the trial court for abuse of evidentiary evidence? (California, United States of America)

Can an evidentiary ruling be reversed if the trial court admitted or denied evidence of abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)

How do courts review a trial court's ruling on whether an examiner's question calls for a speculative answer under the abuse of discretion standard? (California, United States of America)

Does the "right ruling, wrong reasoning" rule apply to an evidentiary ruling that required the trial court to make findings of fact? (California, United States of America)

How have the courts interpreted the evidentiary rulings in cases involving abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)

Does the Attorney General's assertion that appellate courts review probation conditions for abuse of abuse of power, if the issue was raised in the trial court? (California, United States of America)

Does a restitution order for abuse of discretion constitute an abuse of the court's discretion? (California, United States of America)

Can a defendant obtain a new trial on the grounds that the trial court did not abuse its discretion to deny the motion on the same grounds as the previous motion? (California, United States of America)