Is there a requirement that the principal who intentionally and personally discharged the firearm must be convicted of the crime, or even be identified as an aider and abettor?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Martin, B239366 (Cal. App. 2014):

There is no requirement that the principal who intentionally and personally discharged the firearm must be convicted of the offense, or even that he or she must be identified. (People v. Garcia (2002) 28 Cal.4th 1166, 1173 ["the absence of a shooter's

Page 12

conviction is not dispositive of the aider and abettor's exposure to liability"].)4 In order to find an aider and abettor subject to the sentence enhancements of section 12022.53, the aider and abettor must be convicted of the underlying offense (i.e., the murder of Juarez); but there is no requirement that the principal who intentionally and personally discharged the firearm must be convicted of the offense. (People v. Garcia, supra, 28 Cal.4th at p. 1174.)

Other Questions


What is the difference between the mental state required for a conviction of a specific intent crime and that of those convicted of a general intent crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who is convicted of receiving stolen property in one crime, but never charged or convicted of the other crime, be required to pay restitution for losses sustained in other crimes? (California, United States of America)
Does section 31 of the California Criminal Code permit an aider and abettor to be convicted of a lesser crime or lesser degree of crime than the ultimate crime committed by the perpetrator? (California, United States of America)
Is the intent of an aider and abettor to facilitate the commission of a specific intent crime necessarily the intent to achieve a future consequence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for the prosecution to prove that someone who was a principal in the crime personally discharged a firearm during the commission of the crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between finding that a principal in the commission of a felony and finding that one or more principals in the crime was personally armed with a firearm? (California, United States of America)
If a person is convicted of violating section 246.3 of the California Penal Code as an aider and abettor of a firearm offence, does that constitute a strike? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, is intent to commit the crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
Can a person be found liable as an aider and abettor of a crime if they were "concerned" in the commission of the crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a person convicted of a murder committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang and who discharged a firearm in the commission of the crime? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.