Is there a federal requirement for case proportionality review?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Sanchez, D065028 (Cal. App. 2015):

11. Contrary to Sanchez's contention, "intercase proportionality review is not required by the Eighth Amendment to the federal Constitution." (People v. Jackson (2014) 58 Cal.4th 724, 774.)

Other Questions


What is the federal and federal standard for determining proportionality under the Eighth Amendment? (California, United States of America)
What is the substantial evidence required to review a decision by the Federal Communications Commission? (California, United States of America)
What is the retroactivity of new federal habeas corpus rules in federal federal courts? (California, United States of America)
Can a federal and state prosecutor be found guilty of misconduct in a federal or federal criminal case? (California, United States of America)
If a proper initial study has been conducted, does the standard of review shift to a de novo review of whether an EIR was required? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant files a Pitchess motion for in camera review of a police officer's personnel file, what are the requirements for such review? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant denied equal protection because he has not received either intercase proportionality review or appropriate intracase review? (California, United States of America)
Is case proportionality review required in aggravation and mitigation cases? (California, United States of America)
Can a federal judge order in camera review of in camera testimony from a federal grand jury? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a judge to determine whether or not to grant a motion for judicial review of a motion requiring a judicial review? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.