The following excerpt is from Woratzeck v. Ricketts, 820 F.2d 1450 (9th Cir. 1987):
I do differ with the rationale of the majority, however, concerning the claim of right defense and the failure to give a theft instruction. Despite dictum in State v. Flores, 140 Ariz. 469, 682 P.2d 1136, 1140 (App.1984), I agree with the district court that the 1978 amendments to Arizona's criminal statutes eliminate a claim of right defense to the crime of robbery under the facts of this case.
"Robbery" is defined as:
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.