California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Oerding, C081206 (Cal. App. 2017):
Defendant was not charged with theft. Nor is theft a lesser included offense of burglary. (See People v. Tatem, supra, 62 Cal.App.3d at p. 658; People v. Bernal, supra, 22 Cal.App.4th at p. 1458.) Accordingly, theft as a separate charge was not available for the jury's consideration. As such, defendant was not entitled to a separate instruction on theft.
In addition, as discussed above, the jury was unable to reach a verdict on the robbery charges and they were dismissed. Thus, any error in not instructing the jury on theft as a lesser included offense of robbery was harmless. (See People v. Breverman, supra, 19 Cal.4th at p. 154.)
Page 10
The judgment is affirmed.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.