Can a defendant argue that theft is not a lesser included or lesser related crime of burglary?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Matteo, B265815 (Cal. App. 2017):

Defendant here is correct that theft is not a lesser included offense of burglary, because burglary can be committed without stealing. (See People v. Tatem (1976) 62 Cal.App.3d 655, 658; People v. Bernal (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1455, 1458.) It is unclear whether defense counsel here believed, incorrectly, that theft is a lesser included offense of burglary or whether he thought, correctly, that theft is a lesser related offense of burglary. In any event, we cannot conclude that defense counsel provided ineffective assistance by agreeing to instruct the jury on theft.

Page 14

(See generally People v. Birks (1998) 19 Cal.4th 108, 112-113, 136, fn. 19 [instruction on lesser related offense is proper upon the parties' mutual consent]; People v. Taylor (2010) 48 Cal.4th 574, 622.) Defense counsel could have believed there was a risk that if the jury did not have a "lesser" as an option, the jury would convict defendant of the greater crime of burglary. Stated otherwise, given a choice between all or nothing, the jury would go with all. To prevent the risk of an "all or nothing" outcome, defense counsel may have decided to give the jury an option.

Other Questions


Is petty theft a lesser included or lesser related crime of burglary? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant to be convicted of a lesser included or lesser included crime? (California, United States of America)
Does the doctrine of the lesser included offense doctrine apply to a defendant who has pleaded guilty to a charge of a related but not necessarily included crime? (California, United States of America)
Is a lesser included crime to another crime where both crimes are charged? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant is charged with conspiracy to commit a lesser included crime, what is the duty of the court to instruct the jury on all necessarily included offenses? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of a lesser included crime of the same crime under both sections of the California Penal Code and Section 654 of the Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of both a greater crime and a necessarily included lesser crime for the same conduct? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have a duty to instruct the jury on its own motion concerning the crime of being an accessory after the fact as a lesser included crime of accessory to murder? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of both the lesser included and the greater included crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of an uncharged crime of a lesser included offense of a charged crime? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.