Is prior bad act evidence admissible under Rule 404(b)?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from United States v. Flucas, No. 2:17-CR-0209-KJM (E.D. Cal. 2018):

To be admissible under Rule 404(b), the prior bad act evidence (1) must prove a material, non-propensity point, (2) must not be too remote, (3) must be reliable enough to show the defendant actually committed the prior act, and (4) must be similar to the charged offense. United States v. Verduzco, 373 F.3d 1022, 1027 (9th Cir. 2004) (citations omitted).

Other Questions


How is the admission of evidence pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) reviewed? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for admissible evidence of prior acts under Rule 404(b)? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is evidence of a prior heroin transaction admissible at trial under Rule 404(b)? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is evidence of prior bad acts admissible under Rule 404(b) of the Criminal Code? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting evidence of prior bad acts under Rule 404(b)? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In assessing the evidence with respect to irreparable harm, does the court have to rely only on admissible evidence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting evidence of prior convictions under Rule 404(b)? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for admissibility of evidence in the context of evidence that is not logically tending to prove a point? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is there any evidence of a subsequent robbery admissible under Rule 404(b) of the Criminal Code? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can prior act evidence be admitted under Rule 404(b)(2) to demonstrate absence of mistake? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.