Is it misconduct to suggest that evidence available to the government, but not before the jury, corroborates the testimony of a witness?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Mitchell, B266080 (Cal. App. 2016):

prestige or reputation of their office, in support of it.' [Citation.] Similarly, it is misconduct 'to suggest that evidence available to the government, but not before the jury, corroborates the testimony of a witness.'" [Citations.]' [Citation.]" (People v. Mendoza (2016) 62 Cal.4th 856, 906 (Mendoza).)

Other Questions


Is it improper for a prosecutor to offer assurances that a witness is credible or to suggest that evidence available to the government but not before the jury corroborates the testimony of the witness? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury's misconduct in a jury trial prejudice a defendant who refused to take the witness stand because the jury did not want to hear from him? (California, United States of America)
Does the jury's decision to acquit Wash of burglary and dissuading a witness mean that the jury did not categorically accept all of the prosecution's evidence and reject all the defense evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is a witness who gives evidence at a joint trial considered a witness against a defendant if the jury is instructed to consider that testimony only against a codefendant? (California, United States of America)
Is there any evidence that corroborates the allegedly corroborated testimony of a witness who was severely impeached? (California, United States of America)
Is a witness who gives evidence at a joint trial considered a witness against a defendant if the jury is instructed to consider that testimony only against a codefendant? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury's misconduct in a jury trial prejudice a defendant who refused to take the witness stand because the jury did not want to hear from him? (California, United States of America)
Is a witness who gives evidence at a joint trial considered a witness against a defendant if the jury is instructed to consider that testimony only against a codefendant? (California, United States of America)
When will a jury consider the credibility of a defendant's extrajudicial statements against trial testimony and the physical evidence and testimony of witnesses? (California, United States of America)
When a witness gives evidence that incriminating statements should not be considered as evidence by a jury, when the witness is a codefendant, what should the court say? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.