Is interrogation of a witness a form of interrogation that is not threatening?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from NLRB v. Master Touch Dental Laboratories, Inc., 405 F.2d 80 (2nd Cir. 1968):
This court stated in Bourne v. NLRB, 332 F.2d 47, 48 (2d Cir. 1964), that "under our decisions interrogation, not itself threatening, is not held to be an unfair labor practice unless it meets certain fairly severe standards."
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is there a prejudicial error if a witness is a cooperating witness? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the deterrent effect of a prison sentence for a convicted drug dealer who is also a witness witness? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a witness is unavailable to be extradited from the country where the witness is based? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a witness is intimidated into giving evidence to a grand jury, is that intimidation offset by the introduction of the witness's prior testimony? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor cross-examine a witness to state that the witness is offering false testimony? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a prison assistant's failure to interview an inmate's witnesses for a disciplinary hearing a violation of the inmate's right to access their witnesses? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the Government have any case law that supports its argument that "the same analysis applies whether the witness is an expert or a lay witness"? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can we reverse if the evidence supports the reasonable inference that by giving a nod to a witness that the witness was guilty of perjury? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can the Crown argue that answers obtained on the cross-examination of a witness can be used to attack the credibility of another witness? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is there any case law where two witnesses testified to different transactions but one of the two witnesses was corroborated as to one transaction but not the other? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
