The following excerpt is from MT Chamber of Commerce v. Argenbright, 226 F.3d 1049 (9th Cir. 1999):
statute, we conclude here that, " `[a] restriction so destructive of the right of public discussion [as I-125], without greater or more imminent danger to the public interest than existed in this case, is incompatible with the freedoms secured by the First Amendment.' " Id. at 792 (quoting Thomas v. Collins, 323 U.S. 516, 537 (1945)).6 Its enforcement was, therefore, properly enjoined.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.