Is erroneous admission of statements obtained in violation of the Fifth Amendment reviewed for prejudice?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Virto, B243201 (Cal. App. 2016):
As Elizalde instructs, "[t]he erroneous admission of a defendant's statements obtained in violation of the Fifth Amendment is reviewed for prejudice under the beyond a reasonable doubt standard of Chapman v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 18 [(Chapman)].
Page 37
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is erroneous admission of statements obtained in violation of the Fifth Amendment reviewed for prejudice under the beyond reasonable doubt standard? (California, United States of America)
Is erroneous admission of a defendant's statements obtained in violation of the Fifth Amendment reviewed for prejudice? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for erroneous admission of statements obtained in violation of the Fifth Amendment? (California, United States of America)
How is the erroneous admission of a statement obtained in violation of the Fifth Amendment/Miranda? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where DNA obtained from a PAS device was obtained in violation of a defendant's Fourth Amendment right? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant has adopted a statement as his own as an adoptive admission, is that statement admissible under the hearsay rule? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a trial court's decision on the Miranda issue, does the court have to agree that a statement was obtained in violation of the Miranda Act? (California, United States of America)
Does the erroneous admission of a confession that was coerced or obtained in violation of Miranda require reversal? (California, United States of America)
What is the scope of review for a claim that a statement was inadmissible at trial because it was obtained in violation of the Miranda rights? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a finding that Miranda was violated, what is the test for determining whether a statement was illegally obtained? (California, United States of America)
