Is collateral allusions to protected activity not a sufficient basis to be subject to the anti-SLAPP statute?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Old Republic Constr. Program Grp. v. Boccardo Law Firm, Inc., 179 Cal.Rptr.3d 129, 230 Cal.App.4th 859 (Cal. App. 2014):
incidental to a cause of action based essentially on nonprotected activity, collateral allusions to protected activity should not subject the cause of action to the anti-SLAPP statute. (Robles v. Chalilpoyil, supra, 181 Cal.App.4th at p. 575, 104 Cal.Rptr.3d 628.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a claim arise from protected activity when that activity underlies or forms the basis for the anti-SLAPP statute? (California, United States of America)
When harmonizing two statutes relating to the same subject, can a particular or specific statute take precedence over a conflicting general statute? (California, United States of America)
Are litigation activities protected activity within the meaning of the Anti-SLAPP statute? (California, United States of America)
Can a small possibility of a statute arguably being applied to protected conduct be invalidated or speculative restriction of the statute? (California, United States of America)
Is a member of a street gang who actively participates in any criminal street gang with knowledge that its members engage in criminal gang activity liable for criminal activity? (California, United States of America)
Does section 425.16 of the California Anti-SLAPP Act protect activity that is not in furtherance of constitutionally protected speech or petition? (California, United States of America)
Are communications by lawyers as part of their representation in a judicial proceeding protected as a petitioning activity by the anti-SLAPP statute? (California, United States of America)
Is Proposition 8 a single subject subject to the single subject rule? (California, United States of America)
Is a claim under section 425.16 of the anti-SLAPP statute a protected activity? (California, United States of America)
What constitutes protected activity under the anti-SLAPP statute? (California, United States of America)
