Is a statement by an investigator admissible under section 1230 reviewed for abuse of discretion?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Prince, B297599 (Cal. App. 2021):
A trial court's decision whether a statement is admissible under Evidence Code section 1230 is reviewed for abuse of discretion. (Grimes, supra, 1 Cal.5th at pp. 711-712; People v. Lawley (2002) 27 Cal.4th 102, 153.)
c. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding the investigator's testimony
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for abuse of discretion in deciding whether a statement is admissible under section 1230 of the Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
Is a prior statement admissible under section 1235 for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Is a court's ruling on a motion for discretionary relief under section 473(b) 6 reviewed for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for abuse of discretion in the context of a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review in the context of hearsay or abuse of discretion on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does a restitution order for abuse of discretion constitute an abuse of the court's discretion? (California, United States of America)
Is a motion concerning the admissibility of evidence subject to review for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What is the abuse of discretion standard for a review of a decision to strike or not to strike a prior conviction under section 1385 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Is a denial of a petition pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 237 reviewed for an abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for abuse of discretion in determining whether a judge abused discretion in finding that a plaintiff's photographs were prejudicial? (California, United States of America)
