California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Calhoun, 141 Cal.App.3d 117, 190 Cal.Rptr. 115 (Cal. App. 1983):
[141 Cal.App.3d 127] Sex crimes against multiple victims are deemed separate transactions for purposes of section 654, for sentencing on the crime itself. (People v. Perez (1979) 23 Cal.3d 545, 553, 153 Cal.Rptr. 40, 591 P.2d 63.) Moreover, section 1170.1(h) mandates imposition of a full, consecutive term for each enhancement on each enumerated sex crime. (See People v. Ottombrino (1982) 127 Cal.App.3d 574, 588-589, 179 Cal.Rptr. 676, where the trial court was found to have improperly stayed a three-year enhancement under section 12022.3 incident to a conviction of rape, in view of the clear
Page 122
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.