The following excerpt is from Am. Beverage Ass'n v. City of S.F., 871 F.3d 884 (9th Cir. 2017):
Finally, we must consider whether an injunction is in the public interest. Winter , 555 U.S. at 22, 129 S.Ct. 365. We have "consistently recognized the significant public interest in upholding First Amendment principles." Doe , 772 F.3d at 583 (internal quotation marks omitted). Indeed, "it is always in the public interest to prevent the violation of a party's constitutional rights." Melendres v. Arpaio , 695 F.3d 990, 1002 (9th Cir. 2012) (internal quotation marks omitted). Accordingly, a
[871 F.3d 899]
preliminary injunction is in the public interest here.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.