California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Sho Inouye v. Wellpoint Cos. of Cal., B294020 (Cal. App. 2020):
Plaintiff again asserts his argument that he was not aware of the policy's terms, but this is (a) not supported by the record, and (b) irrelevant because plaintiff's awareness of a contract's potentially illusory terms has no bearing on whether they are, under the law, illusory (cf. Fitz v. NCR Corp. (2004) 118 Cal.App.4th 702, 722 [party's awareness of one-sided contractual terms does not render them less one-sided]).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.