California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Florez, F064311 (Cal. App. 2013):
We must first address defendant's severance motion as made in the trial court. Defendant had moved to sever the firearm possession charge on the basis it was unduly prejudicial to the homicide charges. On appeal, defendant abandons that argument and argues the exact opposite: the homicide charges were unduly prejudicial to the firearm possession charges. As defendant failed to present this argument in the trial court, he has forfeited the argument on appeal. (People v. Stanley (1995) 10 Cal.4th 764, 798 [asserted ground for severance forfeited where not raised at trial].)
Page 14
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.