California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Steele, A150190 (Cal. App. 2018):
Appellant seeks strength from the fact that he cannot find published authority rejecting his theory that the "in the commission of requirement in section 12022.5(a) requires a jury finding that the defendant's personal gun use facilitated the completion of the felony. We conclude that this theory is inconsistent with People v. Pitto (2008) 43 Cal.4th 228 (Pitto), which addressed parallel language in section 12022, a sentence enhancement for people who are armed with a firearm "in the commission of" specified crimes.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.