California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Smith, 268 Cal.App.2d 754, 74 Cal.Rptr. 379 (Cal. App. 1969):
Defendant's contentions that the use of prior inconsistent statements for impeachment was a violation of his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination and that there was error in the instructions are also without merit. The rule that defendant's testimony may be impeached by prior inconsistent statements is well established. (Brown v. United States, 356 U.S. 148, 154--155, 78 S.Ct. 622, 2 L.Ed.2d 589.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.