Is a defendant entitled to a jury trial and proof beyond a reasonable doubt on the issue of Page 3?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Kingery, C076725 (Cal. App. 2015):
Citing Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000) 530 U.S. 466 [147 L.Ed.2d 435], defendant contends he is entitled to a jury trial and proof beyond a reasonable doubt on the issue of
Page 3
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the doctrine of reasonable doubt apply to a defendant's due process right to appeal against a jury verdict that diminished the prosecution's burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant entitled to an instruction on the requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant has a right to a jury determination based upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does the requirement of proof of every element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt apply to jury instructions in a state criminal trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the absence of lingering doubt from a recitation of evidence the defense offered in an attempt to raise reasonable doubt raise a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does a trial court error of inadequately warning a defendant of the pitfalls and hazards involved in self-representation constitute harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Are instructions to the jury in a state criminal trial that merely omit a proper description of the requirement of proof of every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the trial court should have instructed the jury that it could impose the death penalty only if it found beyond a reasonable doubt that death is appropriate? (California, United States of America)
Are instructions to the jury in a state criminal trial that omit the requirement of proof of every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt automatically reversible? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
