Is a dealer liable when he sells to another dealer because he knows of the defect and fails to disclose it?

Appellant urges that the classification now before us may shield a dealer from liability when he sells to another dealer even though he knows of the defect and fails to disclose it. We do not determine whether such a set of facts would create a problem of constitutional dimensions since nothing in the record presented to us suggests that this is the case now before us. (See [154 Cal.App.3d 952] People v. Parker (1973) 33 Cal.App.3d 842, 849, 109 Cal.Rptr. 354; Pain v. Municipal Court (1968) 268 Cal.App.2d 151, 152, 73 Cal.Rptr. 862.)