The following excerpt is from McDermott v. City of New York, 406 N.E.2d 460, 428 N.Y.S.2d 643, 50 N.Y.2d 211 (N.Y. 1980):
Finally, it cannot be held, as a matter of law, that the city failed to establish a prima facie case of products liability. Both plaintiff, and his coworker, testified that they did not start the hopper mechanism, thus raising a viable issue of fact as to whether the device self-activated. And, since this creates a fact question concerning whether the product performed as intended by the manufacturer, the trier of fact could infer the existence of a defect as of the time of delivery (see, e. g., Codling v. Paglia, 32 N.Y.2d 330, 337-338, 345 N.Y.S.2d 461, 298 N.E.2d 622, supra ). True, there is evidence in the record tending to negate the
Page 649
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.