What is the test for reasonable refusal of a treatment?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Healey v Mault, 2021 BCSC 2197 (CanLII):

The question of whether a person has been reasonable in refusing recommended treatment is one for the trier of fact to decide based on the circumstances of the case, taking into account the degree of risk from the treatment, the gravity of the consequences for refusing it, and the potential benefit to be derived from it: Janiak v. Ippolito, 1985 CanLII 62 (SCC), [1985] 1 S.C.R. 146 at 151-52, 162-3.

Other Questions


What is the test for reasonableness of refusing to take treatment? (British Columbia, Canada)
When an offer made by a defendant for pre-trial settlement is reasonably refused, is the fact that the action is ultimately dismissed in its entirety a factor in determining double costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is reasonable conduct in litigation reasonable enough to warrant a reduction in costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for failing to mitigate by refusing to undergo medical treatment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for making reasonable efforts to improve their health but not being able to afford the treatments? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of not pursuing reasonable recommended courses of medical treatment on damages? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to mitigate by refusing to undergo medical treatment? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a strong medical opinion support that a recommended treatment is both reasonable and necessary? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an occupier to prove reasonable steps taken by the occupier were reasonable in all circumstances? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it reasonable for an offeree to refuse an offer to settle where there are many contentious issues to be tried? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.