Both counsel refer to Janiak v. Ippolito, 1985 CanLII 62 (SCC), [1985] 1 S.C.R. 146, 16 D.L.R. (4th) 1. The plaintiff cites the case for the proposition that the plaintiff is not acting unreasonably if he follows any one of several courses of treatment recommended by medical advisers. In assessing the reasonableness of refusing to take treatment, the trier of fact should take into consideration the risk of the treatment, the gravity of the consequence of refusing it, and the potential benefits to be derived from it.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.