In Thibault v. Rovello (1999), B.C.J. 1457, Meiklem J. reviewed the authorities and concluded at paragraph 15: In my view, there can be no absolute rule that a Master's decision on interim custody and access matters are purely interlocutory, and should not be interfered with on appeal unless established to be clearly wrong. Interim rulings concerning custody of children or access to children must be examined on a case-by-case basis, to determine if the interim ruling will likely have a direct bearing on the disposition of those issues at trial, bearing in mind the specific issues and the length of time the interim ruling will be in place.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.