The following excerpt is from United States v. Gonzales Castro, 228 F.2d 807 (2nd Cir. 1956):
11 Cf. Gindorff v. Prince, 2 Cir., 189 F.2d 897, 898, where, in a civil case, we reversed because we rejected the trial judge's findings of fact, although they were supported by oral testimony of a witness he saw and heard because we considered that testimony patently incredible in the circumstances.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.