In what circumstances will a court award damages for fraud and breach of contract in the same judgment?

Likewise, in Symcox v. Zuk (1963) 221 Cal.App.2d 383, 34 Cal.Rptr. 462, the court affirmed a judgment which awarded Symcox damages on both fraud and contract actions, despite Symcox's having levied a writ of [225 Cal.App.3d 19] attachment before trial. The court found that Symcox's claims for fraud in the inducement to enter a contract and breach of that same contract violated separate primary rights and would support both tort and contract remedies in the same judgment. (Id., at pp. 389-390, 34 Cal.Rptr. 462.)