In what circumstances have the courts allowed the trial judge to interpret the definition of first degree murder as 'Willful, deliberate and premeditated' but not that produced Page 710?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Smith, 108 Cal.Rptr. 698, 33 Cal.App.3d 51 (Cal. App. 1973):

In the light of the record, the error was not prejudicial. In response to People v. Conley, supra, the trial judge's instruction included the standard instruction (CALJIC 8.20), which defines first degree murder as that perpetrated by 'Willful, deliberate and premeditated killing,' formed 'upon preexisting reflection' but not that produced

Page 710

Other Questions


Does the trial court have a duty to instruct the jury as to the elements of first degree murder and the required mens rea for first-degree murder? (California, United States of America)
Does a trial court have to instruct the jury to agree unanimously whether defendant committed premeditated murder or first degree felony murder? (California, United States of America)
Does a trial court have to instruct the jury to agree unanimously whether defendant committed premeditated murder or first degree felony murder? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant enters a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity at trial for a first-degree murder, can he still be found guilty of first degree murder? (California, United States of America)
What is the range of sentences for a man convicted of a first degree murder and two counts of deliberate, premeditated and willful murder? (California, United States of America)
Does a court have a duty to instruct a sua sponte on the provocation that would reduce first degree murder to second-degree murder? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant seek to overturn a conviction for second-degree murder by appealing against the finding that the trial court failed to instruct on the charge of second degree murder? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury be misled by the prosecutor by excising premeditation and deliberation from the elements of first degree premeditated murder? (California, United States of America)
Does the amendment to the lying-in-wait special circumstance in a murder case in which there is a distinction between the special circumstance and lying in-wait first degree murder? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the trial court erred by instructing the jury on first degree murder because the information alleged only that the murder of Agent Cross was committed with malice aforethought? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.