In what circumstances have courts found that the respondent made a showing that she had exercised reasonable diligence prior to the trial?

Does the trial court err when it determined the prosecution exercised reasonable diligence in attempting to secure the victim's attendance at trial? (California, United States of America)

In what circumstances have the courts found the prosecution failed to exercise reasonable diligence in subpoenaing a witness at a preliminary hearing? (California, United States of America)

In what circumstances have courts found that a husband has been found guilty of contempt and/or contempt by reason of failing to show cause? (California, United States of America)

Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)

Is there any case law where the trial court would have exercised its discretion not to award a motion for damages even if the trial judge was aware of the fact that the motion was being brought before the court? (California, United States of America)

In what circumstances will a defendant be able to argue that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing testimony about two prior convictions subject to the conditions the court imposed? (California, United States of America)

In what circumstances will the court apply the totality circumstance test to determine whether the police acted reasonably in responding to a complaint? (California, United States of America)

When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)

In what circumstances have courts reversed a judgment entered in a criminal case following a court trial? (California, United States of America)

Does counsel who fail to respond when given the chance to respond to arguments in an adversarial context deprive the trial court of the opportunity to consider their arguments in a similar context? (California, United States of America)