In what circumstances have courts been found to have abused their discretion in admitting certain "remote" felony convictions for impeachment purposes?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Rollo, 141 Cal.Rptr. 177, 20 Cal.3d 109, 569 P.2d 771 (Cal. 1977):

In two subsequent cases, we have held, successively, that trial courts had abused their discretion in admitting, for impeachment purposes, certain "remote" felony convictions (People v. Antick (1975) 15 Cal.3d 79, 123 Cal.Rptr. 475, 539 P.2d 43), and a "similar" prior conviction where other and dissimilar priors were available (People v. Rist (1976) 16 Cal.3d 211, 127 Cal.Rptr. 457, 545 P.2d 833).

Other Questions


Is a defendant's prior hit and run conviction not an abuse of the court's discretion in admitting evidence of a prior hit-and-run conviction? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a defendant be able to argue that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing testimony about two prior convictions subject to the conditions the court imposed? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have discretion to admit evidence of abuse of power or abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
How is a trial court's admission of prior felony convictions reviewed for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Does a convicted felon who has completed his sentence for a conviction for a felonies conviction under Proposition 47 of the California Criminal Code, who would have been convicted of a misdemeanor under this act if this act had not been in effect? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances have the courts abused their discretion to admit evidence of gang membership? (California, United States of America)
Does a restitution order for abuse of discretion constitute an abuse of the court's discretion? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1170.15 of the California Criminal Code apply when a defendant is convicted of a felony (the first felony) and also convicted of dissuading or attempting to dissuade a victim of the first felony? (California, United States of America)
Does a court have any discretion in denying appellant's request to "sanitize" a child pornography conviction for impeachment purposes? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Court of Appeal reverse a finding that the Court abused its discretion in making a judgment in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.