The present case also seems readily distinguishable from that of In re Boards; Knight v. Knight [1895] 1 Ch. 499, 72 L.T. 220, cited for the next-of-kin, in that the testator there gave separate directions for the conversion of his real and personal estates respectively, and then ordered his executors to mix or blend the proceeds after (and not before, as here) they had paid the debts and legacies into a trust fund for one of the defendants.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.