In Kennedy v. Kennedy (1994) 98 B.C.L.R. (2d) 287 (B.C.S.C.) Madam Justice Newbury commented in para. 16 that there were many B.C. cases in which family assets have been reapportioned in favour of wives because they have been out of the job market for significant periods of time and therefore have reduced income-earning ability or because they require the use of particular assets such as the matrimonial home in order to be able to pursue educational opportunities or to upgrade job skills.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.