California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Ballard v. Uribe, 224 Cal.Rptr. 664, 41 Cal.3d 564, 715 P.2d 624 (Cal. 1986):
Several other jurors stated during the deliberations in Smith v. Covell that the husband should not be awarded damages on his cause of action for loss [41 Cal.3d 592] of consortium since he was obligated by his marriage vow to stay with his wife. These same jurors had agreed on voir dire to follow the law that the court gave them without hesitation. (Smith v. Covell, supra, 100 Cal.App.3d at p. 954, 161 Cal.Rptr. 377.) Finally, yet another juror stated during deliberations that he opposed people suing one another and that awarding high verdicts in personal injury suits caused high insurance rates. (Id., at p. 955, 161 Cal.Rptr. 377.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.