The Ontario Court of Appeal in Drygala v. Pauli, supra, set out the following three questions which should be answered by a court in considering a request to impute income: 1. Is the party intentionally under-employed or unemployed? 2. If so, is the intentional under-employment or unemployment required by virtue of his reasonable educational needs, the needs of the child of the marriage or reasonable health needs? 3. If not, what income is appropriately imputed? The onus is on the party seeking to impute income to the other party to establish that the other party is intentionally unemployed or under-employed.[4]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.