In Sandhu v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration),3 my colleague Justice Cullen dealt with a similar situation in these terms: The same can be said about the notes of the immigration officer in this case. While her section 6 rationale focussed on the applicant"s fear of returning to Guatemala, I am satisfied that her refusal of the humanitarian and compassionate application was made with due consideration to the factors concerning his establishment in Canada, which are set out at some length in her notes. There is no statutory requirement for the immigration officer to provide reasons for her decision. In the same spirit, nor was she obliged to refer to each of her considerations in her rationale.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.