Is there any case law where mere suspicion that collection may be delayed is insufficient?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Canada (Minister of National Revenue) v. Goldland Jewelers Ltd., 2006 ABQB 108 (CanLII):
The Applicant has brought to my attention cases which set out that mere suspicion that collection may be delayed is insufficient. I agree. See Danielson v. Canada (1986), 86 D.T.C. 6518 (F.C.T.D.) at 6519
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is there any case law where the onus is on the delaying party to make out a credible excuse for the delay? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there any difference between the provisions of an earlier collective agreement and that of the current collective agreement? (Alberta, Canada)
Can an arbitrator interpret a collective agreement so that the provisions of the statute intended to affect labour relations come into conflict with the collective agreement? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a collective agreement be interpreted as a statutory right? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the legal test for reasonable suspicion of impaired driving? (Alberta, Canada)
What is a reasonable suspicion for a breath demand? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there a delay in finding that a law firm disqualified because of a conflict of interest? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a delay in taking the action constitutes a bar? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the effect of a collective agreement that limited call-back premiums? (Alberta, Canada)
Do emotional and financial depression and frustration in relation to a lawsuit constitute an excuse for delay? (Alberta, Canada)
