The respondents also urged that delay in taking the proceedings constituted a bar. Allcard v. Skinner was cited to us. For delay to constitute a bar there must, in my view, be a finding that any influence was removed, that the person previously under the influence was capable of acting to undo what was done, and chose not to do so. There is no such finding and the evidence would not support it. Moreover, in principle, for laches or acquiescence to constitute a bar there must be an element of unconscionability and there is no suggestion that the beneficiaries have suffered any cognizable detriment as a result of the delay.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.