This is an interim application where the court can typically provide only rough justice until contested facts can be more fully canvassed at trial: I.F. v. R.J.R., 2015 BCSC 793 at paras. 13-15 and 123. When pronouncing an interim order, the court must be careful not to prejudice either party’s position at trial. Nevertheless, this approach does not necessarily preclude a finding that income ought to be imputed to a party for the purposes of interim spousal support: see, for example, Morrison v. Morrison, 2009 BCSC 256.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.