The respondents submit that in accordance with Hunter v. Southam there must be an exercise of discretion by an independent authorizing judicial officer to balance “the right of the individual to be free from state interference to the interest of the state in advancing its purposes through such interference”. The respondents submit that state intrusion is justified only where “there are reasonable and probable grounds to believe that evidence of the commission of any offence will be found.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.