Does authorization with its basket clause violate the principle of a requirement of judicial authorization?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from R. v. Mojtahedpour, 2001 BCSC 460 (CanLII):
He found that the authorization with its basket clause did not offend the principle of a requirement of judicial authorization as a means of preventing “unqualified searches” as the term was used in Hunter v. Southam, supra.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In assessing the credibility of an author, is the author’s credibility of the author? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can the presumption of equitable principles be displaced by equitable principles? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Attorney General have any authority or authority to issue a regulation which abrogates common law rights to justice and fairness? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the judicial review approach used by a court engaged in judicial review? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party before the court be ordered to provide authorizations for the delivery of documents by the US tax authorities? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the prematurity principle mean that a judicial review petition will not be heard before a tribunal has rendered its final decision? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Court of Appeal have any authority or authority to interpret a document that states that a debt is enforceable? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Court of Appeal have any authority or authority to overturn a conviction or sentence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for the authority of a local authority to enforce a ban on the sale and consumption of alcohol? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a violation of section 135(3) of the noise bylaw required to be met by the Strata Plan VR 2000? (British Columbia, Canada)
