I disagree. In Lévesque Gonthier J. noted at para. 17, that “the overriding consideration must be the interests of justice, regardless of whether the appeal is from a verdict or a sentence.” At para. 20, he remarked that appeal courts should determine questions of fact only when the fresh evidence presents certain characteristics such as would justify the expansion of the traditional appellate role, and that those characteristics were those identified in Palmer v. R., [1989] 1 S.C.R. 759.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.