How should have been pleaded in the context of the Judicature Act?
Nova Scotia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Rogers v. Rogers, 1937 CanLII 522 (NS CA):
Illegality should have been pleaded: Judicature Act, Order 19, rule 15; 13ullen. & Leake, 697; 77 E.R. 'at 241 (Note); Peoples tank of Halifax v. Johnson, (supra), at p. 543.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In assessing a motion for summary judgment on pleadings, how have the pleadings been interpreted? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for unjust enrichment in the context of a broken-up relationship? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for reasonableness in the context of a judicial review? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is considered "dangerous" in the context of an interim proceeding? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for privacy in the context of section 8 of the Charter? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What are the principles of amending a pleading? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the status quo in the context of an interim parenting arrangement? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in the context of child protection proceedings? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the "polycentricity principle" in the context of statutory supervision? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for "pure application" in the context of functus officio? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
