How is the standard of review applied in determining the sufficiency of the evidence?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from State v. Williams, 111 Cal.Rptr.2d 732 (Cal. App. 2001):
21. We apply the traditional standard of review in determining the sufficiency of the evidence: "[T]he reviewing court's task is to review the whole record in the light most favorable to the judgment to determine whether it discloses substantial evidence-that is, evidence that is reasonable, credible, and of solid value-such that a reasonable trier of fact could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. [Citation.]" (People v. Rodriguez, supra, 20 Cal.4th at p. 11.)
21. We apply the traditional standard of review in determining the sufficiency of the evidence: "[T]he reviewing court's task is to review the whole record in the light most favorable to the judgment to determine whether it discloses substantial evidence-that is, evidence that is reasonable, credible, and of solid value-such that a reasonable trier of fact could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. [Citation.]" (People v. Rodriguez, supra, 20 Cal.4th at p. 11.)
22. Counts 7-9, 11-12, 14-17, and 19-20.
22. Counts 7-9, 11-12, 14-17, and 19-20.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
