How have the courts treated the government's objection to a request by counsel for information on the basis of relevancy?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from Raymond v. United States, 376 F.2d 581 (9th Cir. 1967):

The government objected to the question on the grounds of relevancy; the objection was sustained by the trial court but with the express qualification that the ruling was without prejudice to counsel's right to pursue the line of inquiry upon a demonstration of the materiality of the information sought. Counsel for appellant abandoned the inquiry without any attempt to proceed along the lines suggested by the trial judge, or to otherwise advise the court of the question's purpose. The information sought was not "inevitably and patently material." On such a record we find no error. Harris v. United States, 371 F.2d 365, 366 (9th Cir. 1967).

Affirmed.

Other Questions


What is the basis for a federal district court's finding that a state court transcript is sufficient basis for the district court to grant a motion requiring an evidentiary hearing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts treated the implied consent of counsel in cases where counsel objected to certain evidence at trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court treat the government's failure to present its position in a full brief on the merits of a motion for attorney's fees as an error of counsel? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts treated counsel's decision to rest at the end of the government's case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does counsel's refusal to renew his objection because it was so forcefully presented and unequivocally rebuffed by the court that it was apparent that further efforts to object would be unavailing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts treated a Rule 17(b) request for a court-ordered subpoena? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts treated a request by a defendant for information regarding the manner in which the drug dealer was allegedly introduced to him by an undercover agent? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts treated defense counsel's objection to Exhibit 6 at trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a federal court's refusal to order the government to accept a subpoena for a confidential informer produce the same effects as a decision not to disclose the identity of a confidential informant? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a defense counsel's statement that the trial date was "convenient" constitute a duty to inform the court that counsel would nevertheless seek to dismiss the motion? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.