How have the courts treated statements in a prosecutor's closing argument?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Davidson, H037751 (Cal. App. 2015):

The statements challenged by defendant on appeal constitute only a fraction of the prosecutor's closing argument. Additionally, the jury was specifically instructed by the court that the attorneys' arguments were not evidence and that they were not to be swayed by public opinion or public feeling. "The presumptions that jurors understand and follow their instructions [citation] and do not draw the most damaging inferences from ambiguous arguments [citation] minimize our concern that the instant jury's verdict was influenced by a misapplication of the prosecutor's remarks." (People v. Shazier (2014) 60 Cal.4th 109, 150-151.)

Other Questions


In closing argument in a personal injury case, can the court admonish the appellant for failing to object to any statements in closing argument? (California, United States of America)
In closing argument in a personal injury case, can the court admonish the appellant on appeal for failing to object to any statements in closing argument? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, in what circumstances would the jury have considered a defense counsel's closing argument that the prosecutor's rebuttal to the closing argument had the trial court sustained an objection? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated the prosecutor's closing argument in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated a prosecutor's appeal to the jurors' sympathy for the victim during closing argument? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted comments made by a prosecutor in a civil case where the prosecutor suggested that the prosecutor's theories were not the exclusive theories that may be considered by the court? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated the issue of improper comments by a prosecutor in closing argument? (California, United States of America)
Does a court have to give deference to a prosecutor's argument that the prosecutor's credibility was compromised by the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Is there a reasonable likelihood that a prosecutor's comment at the closing argument was directed solely at the persuasive force of defense counsel's closing argument? (California, United States of America)
When will a court admit a prosecutor's prior statements about the crime in their closing argument? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.